Tag Archives: Nonprofits

Procrastination… my name is board member

Without telling anyone I decided to take the summer off from the blog. Unfortunately, I took the summer off from being a board member too. I didn’t tell anyone about this either.

It was not my intention to stop being a decent board member, it just happened. I got wrapped up in my consulting work, trying to run a 5K in under 30 minutes, and writing a book… on board engagement by the way. So here I am at the end of the summer and there is a bunch of overdue items that I said I would do, but have not delivered on them… like making donor calls, working on the organization’s strategic plan, and being present for the outgoing CEO.

One of the hardest parts of board membership is being engaged when you do not feel engaged. I could blame this on the organization, the cause, or (worse) my fellow board members and the staff I work with, but the reality is my engagement is my responsibility. I have had a list of items in my to do box and I chose to ignore it.

When I was an executive director, I hated board members who procrastinated. They put me in the unenviable position of having to call on them and ask if they did their work. I used to think… “What am I, their mother?” I promised myself I would never do that when I was a board member. Oops! I just did.

Sometimes work is just work. It has to get done. We have to inch our way forward to the next opportunity. Board leadership, like any other job, requires a focus on getting things done even when it doesn’t inspire you that very moment. But like most good things, all those little steps that are taken both individually and with your colleagues, comes together into something wonderful, meaningful, and engaging.

Now, where is that list?

Rewrite Your Next Board Meeting

At the first board meeting I ever attended, the only person who spoke was my boss, the executive director. Driving back to the office, she asked me what I thought of the meeting. I told her the board was not very engaged. She agreed and said, “I just don’t know how to change that.” I held my tongue thinking to myself, “You can start by shutting up and letting them talk to each other.”

When it was my turn to be an executive director, I humbly admit that I suffered from the same problem—sitting in board meetings, yammering on, and trying to ignite a new level of board engagement through the brilliance I was spewing forth. Now as a board member, I am sympathetic to the executive directors, who cannot stand the excruciating silence and feel the need to share everything in their brain, and my fellow board members who wish the meeting were a million times more engaging.

According BoardSource’s Nonprofit Governance Index 2010, “Boards that are more engaged spend more time on strategic thinking and discussion.” Or, (this is me talking): “Boards that suck, don’t talk to one another and let the executive director run off at the mouth.”

Neither strong (and talented) executive directors, nor quiet (and thoughtful) board members are the problem. The issue is the 60 to 120-minute monthly, bi-monthly, or quarterly experience they have together. Board meetings run on these deep ingrained scripts that are overwritten and uninspired. Agendas, minutes, and reporting lull us into complacency rather than provoking strategic thinking and creativity that drives us toward improvement and innovation. We need to rewrite the script of our next board meeting with fewer monologues for the executive director and more dialogues involving everyone in the room.

Here are a few ways to rip up the current agenda and rewrite the meeting:

1. Imagine a Future – Discussions of vision and goals are typically relegated to the once-a-year retreat when it should be happening at every board meeting. Set aside 30 to 45 minute in the meeting to raise and discuss major strategic questions, examine the organization’s business model, and identify how environmental changes are affecting the organization’s impact. Don’t just talk, synthesize—define a board point of view on the matter and, when appropriate, mobilize members to tackle the issue.

2. Align Resources – Present a financial report that challenges board and staff to imagine how resources can be used more effectively. Instead of reviewing the balance sheet, discuss how eliminating long-term debt can increase dollars for programs or how restricted assets can be better positioned to forward the organization’s strategy. Discover what is driving organizational income and how the expense budget can be better positioned to grow vital revenue sources. Most importantly, ensure that the budget aligns to the strategies developed by the board and staff.

3. Improve Performance – Throw out the typical program report and let board members dive deep into the cause. Have discussions about how impact is created. Focus in on one aspect of the organization’s work, discuss how it works, and explore how it can work better. Overcome the fear that volunteer board members will never understand what professional staff does. Challenge everyone to move beyond off-the-cuff ideas to thinking that is relevant and meaningful to the work.

4. Frame the Message – If board members are going to be on message, they need to help create the message. Let’s get past spoon-feeding what we want board members to say. As strategies, resources, and impact are discussed, let’s encourage members to frame the message. They need to hear the stories that best illustrate the value of the organization’s work, but they also need to create their own stories, using their own words, and in their own voice.

Has Your Nonprofit Board Been Neutered?

Here’s a simple way to find out. In a middle of a board meeting, look at the people around the table and ask yourself: Does the quality of this discussion match the quality of people?

Granted, “quality” is fairly subjective. Yet, it is pretty easy to tell if you have a group of individuals who have a history of success in life and are deeply engaged in family, work, and community service, but for some reason cannot elevate the conversation in the board room beyond trivial issues that are not core to the strengthening the performance of the organization. If this is the situation, your board members have been neutered. They are unclear about why they are getting together with people they hardly know, unclear about what their role and purpose is, and unclear, ultimately, about why they should be engaged.

Worse yet, the nonprofit field has tacitly accepted this “neutered” role for boards. Oh yes, we want effective boards, but we have lowered the bar. We have accepted that the right place for boards is to make decisions over budgets they don’t truly understand, to hire professionals to lead organizations they truly don’t understand, and to approve strategy and actions to create results that they truly don’t understand.

Do we really believe that the next generation of board leaders will accept this? All signs point to Millennials’ commitment to causes is not just hands on, it is hands deep. What this generation teaches us is that for boards to avoid being neutered and to become relevant and meaningful we need to allow them to focus on and shape what truly matters — creating value for the communities they serve.

Here are a few questions for boards to consider:

1. What would happen if we changed the focus of board leadership away from governance and oversight to efficiently and effectively creating value?

2. How can we build an environment within the board meeting where each member is able to listen for the purpose of the organization and share their creativity, skills, and expertise to address the most important issues?

3. How can we grow the board’s sense of accountability to all stakeholders through our focus on developing innovative ideas to improve performance?

Boards that have answered these questions, have avoided being neutered. They see their purpose as central to the cause, they have moved beyond passive oversight and have embraced an active role of seeking out opportunities and innovations to improve the creation of value.

Defining Your Organization’s Value

This installment of the Sixty-Second Strategy covers a quick exercise to help organizations define the value they create and deliver to the communities they serve.

For more information, go to the related post entitled Owning Your Place in the Community.

Also, visit the previous Sixty-Second Strategy installment– Kick Start Your Story.

Owning Your Place in the Community

[The following is an excerpt from a keynote I gave to the Southern Minnesota Nonprofit Summit.]

Fifteen years ago this week was when I arrived in Minnesota to become the Executive Director of The Playwrights’ Center. My wife and I were newly married. We drove 900 miles from Dallas to Minnesota with most our belongings in tow. I was very excited about taking this position. At 27, I would have a staff of 12, a budget of just under a million dollars, financial reserves in the bank, and a strong national reputation to build on. What I didn’t know, it was all a house of cards.

I remember feeling something was up during the interview process and after I took the job it became quickly apparent that the organization was not great shape. The first sign was how out of step the staff and board were with one another, and the second sign, was how disconnected the board was with the organization as a whole. Most troubling, was how the organization’s main participants, playwrights, universally felt the organization was past its prime.

After a week on the job, I was on an airplane going to a national conference and I had brought my calculator along. I was working through next year’s budget on some scratch paper. It might of have been some turbulence or a change in altitude, but I remember my eyes rolling up inside my head and falling against the window, thinking to myself: “What the hell have I done? Why did I take this job?” I was staring out the window at the clouds, but what I was really staring at was an organization that only had half the income needed to balance next years budget with all of its reserves spent on paying off the current year’s expenses.

Cutting half of your expenses is not trimming the fat, it’s not even just cutting into the bone, it’s all out amputation. Not to sound too graphic, but what followed was a blood bath. We cut programs, staff, anything and everything. After we were done (besides the fact that no one on staff would talk to me) we bought ourselves a little time, but we did not solve the intrinsic issue—we had become irrelevant.

Soon after I was having lunch with a board member, who had been on the board for about four years, and she asked me: “What is that we do?” After staring blankly at her, I launched into my spiel and quickly realized she wasn’t listening. She stopped me and said: “Why should I care?”

As you can imagine, this was a very dark moment for me, but also a very illuminating one.

A client of mine, whose organization was in a similar situation, once said to me: “We are not who we are.” This struck me because if you do not know who you are, then no one else knows who you are. Your organization lives on the edge of relevancy. It does not own a place in the community. It’s peripheral.

Overtime, I have come to learn that answering the question “who are we?” is not solved by just developing a well-worded mission statement. Knowing your purpose is important, but it is only an inward view. Leading healthy and impactful organizations requires both an inward and outward view of your work. Knowing “who are we?” is also about the value you choose to create, and more importantly, who you create this value for. The value you choose to create is ultimately what determines who you are in relationship with and allows you to shine a light on your place in the community.

Please take out a sheet of paper.

1. In the middle of the sheet of paper create a box large enough to write inside of it. Like this.

2. Now, in the middle of the box, write down the specific meaningful value your organization creates and delivers to the communities you serve. This is different than your mission. This is actually what gets delivered—as tangible as food for the hungry or intangible as food for the soul. Be specific as possible.

3. Now, at the top of the box describe the people who directly receive the value you have created and delivered. These are your participants or clients or audiences.

4. Identify the people who are investing in the value you create, again be as specific as possible. These could be foundations, individual donors, and government agencies.

5. The next step is a little more difficult. Identify the people who benefit from the value you create but not directly. This could be a neighbor living on a street where gang violence has declined due to your youth program.

6. Now, identify the people who create this value. This is you, your board and staff, and volunteers as well as partners you work with.

7. Finally, look at your work and answer the following questions:

    How relevant is the value you create to the people around the box?

    If you change the value you create, how would the people around this box change? Who would join and who would go away?

    Is there audience or constituency you always wanted a relationship with, what kind of change in value would you need to make in order to be relevant enough to attract them?

    How can we accelerate pursuit of our mission by creating value that brings the people we need to succeed together?

Keeping an eye on the value you create, needs to be a strategic governance and operational priority. Not only to sustain your organizations, but to also take your work to new heights. This is not something you check in on every three years, it’s something you do in real time. You also must do it in ways that reaches out beyond your own notions and embraces multiple points of view.

Turkish author, Elif Shafak summed this up nicely in a TED Talk that she did a few years ago, she said: “We all live in a social and cultural circle… If we have no connection what so ever with the world’s beyond the ones we take for granted then we run the risk of drying up inside. Our imagination might shrink, our hearts may dwindle, and our humanness might wither if we stay for too long in our cultural cocoons.”

Inherent to the value we create for the communities we serve is keeping the impulse and inspiration to create alive. We do this by reaching both into and beyond the world “we take for granted” and engaging communities in a creative process.

This is how we saved the Playwrights’ Center from extinction. It didn’t happen overnight, it actually became an ongoing process, one that started with lots of listening that led to many ideas, that led to defining a strategy, that led to taking action, that led to a change in the value we created. In fact, over a six year period, we moved from being a “club house for playwrights” that was no longer relevant into a conduit for playwrights and other artists, playwrights and audiences, playwrights and theatres, playwrights and businesses, etc. to forge deep connections.

Through this rich collaboration with artists, funders, businesses, educators, neighborhood residents, etc.—we came alive. They helped us rediscover the meaning in our work and find our place in the community. And as soon as we did, we started again.

Here are a few principles I would like you to take a way from this talk:

1. Know the value you create. Work with board and staff members to define it.

2. Create an open invitation to explore. Reach beyond your inner circles and welcome others into the process.

3. Instigate and lead the inquiry. We are experts and we should take on the responsibility to ignite these conversations out in the communities we serve.

4. Be passionate not opinionated. Do not create a competition among ideas, welcome differing point of views as well as not lose sight in what you believe.

5. Own the Direction. Once you choose a course of action, take ownership of it and nurture it.

That board member who I had lunch with, got caught up in this rich creative collaboration we forged. She ended up leading our capital campaign to build a place where we could deliver all this value. She raised a lot of money for a cause that she truly believe in.

Nonprofit Branding in the Age of Social Media

An article in the December issue of Twin Cities Business Monthly captures a wonderful case study on the branding work Creation In Common did for CaringBridge. CaringBridge is a nonprofit providing free websites that connect people experiencing a significant health challenge to family and friends, making each health journey easier.

Go here to read the article.

Your Promise Is Your Brand

Here is an oldie but a goodie.

My partner Padraic and I wrote this article for the Nonprofit Quarterly on branding back in 2005. It captures the idea that a strong nonprofit brand goes beyond good marketing. First and foremost, it’s about deep organizational development.

Go here to take a look.

Bookmark Advisor to Superheroes

Help! Your Knowledge and Insight is Needed!

Creation In Common's Nonprofit Branding Model

Six years ago, I wrote Building the Nonprofit Brand from the Inside Out and its time to revise it. Much has changed in the area of nonprofit marketing, communications, and branding.

Before I start my revision, I welcome any thoughts on the topic. Please read the article and send your comments. I will attribute any insights on this blog before relaunching the article.

Thanks,

Carlo
carlo@creationincommon.com

Bookmark Advisor to Superheroes

Three Strategies to Engage Your Board in Fundraising

[This posting appeared as an article in the Fall 2009 edition of Guild Notes, the quarterly newsletter published by The National Guild of Community Schools of the Arts]

“We’re not a fundraising board.” If I had a nickel every time board members have said this to me, I would be able to fund their organizations.

The perceived difference between an Opera Board of well-heeled community leaders and a Community Arts Board made up of the rest of the unwashed masses has driven the myth behind what effective fundraising looks like within an arts institution. This frame of thinking drives the notion that the Opera Board has the money, clout, and know-how to fundraise whereas the Community Arts Board is not wealthy, does not know anyone who is, and feels it lacks the basic skills to make an ask. In reality, the pedigree of your board member has less to do with your fundraising effectiveness than the intrinsic way they are motivated and the systems and process that are used to harness their passion for the cause. I have observed in organizations big and small that it is rare to find the board member who is automatically ready to fundraise which makes it leadership’s job (i.e. the board president, development committee, executive director, etc.) to cultivate board members’ engagement in the fundraising effort.

Here are three strategies to do this:

I. Help Board Members Understand What Connects Them to the Cause
In order to broaden your donor base, you must first deepen your relationship with each board member. It is important to think of the board member as your most important major donor, no matter how much money he or she gives. If your board member is not ready to share his or her time, money, and influence they will not be able to convince others to do the same.

When cultivating a major donor it is important to understand what motivates him or her in relationship to your cause. The same needs to happen with the board member. It is often assumed that when they agree to join the board they are already connected to the cause, but often they are not and most of the time they have very little understanding of the unique value being created by the organization. Hearing stories about the organization’s work and witnessing value being delivered to the community are important ways to help educate board members. It is also important to have conversations with them to learn how they perceive the needs that the organization is meeting, the values that guide the work, and why it is important for the organization to exist. By understanding their point of view on these matters, leadership is able to find the right incentives that will help engage each individual. In addition, it helps the board member and leadership develop a consistent narrative about the organization that can be communicated to potential donors.

II. Help Cast Them in the Right Fundraising Role
When board members talk about fundraising, they often focus on asking for money. In some people this creates an immediate paralysis, yet it is only one part of the process. Through my work with a variety of organization’s boards, my colleagues and I have identified four different roles board members can play in the fundraising process based on their natural strengths and capabilities.

Board members who are Connectors know how to work a room and listen for opportunities. They feel most comfortable being greeters at events, helping to develop a prospect list, or hosting a small gathering in their home. Storytellers love using words to paint pictures for others about the impact of the organization. They excel at standing up and speaking at board meetings and events about the life of the organization or helping write a solicitation letter. The Visionaries are strategic thinkers who know how to position what the organization needs to accomplish with the value it will create. They do well in situations helping the donor understand why their investment is needed and what it will accomplish. Finally, Closers are not deterred from their goal. They are very good at understanding the circumstances of a meeting with a potential donor always looking for the best way to position the ask.

When board members are able to see how their strengths can be engaged in the fundraising effort, they are more willing to engage in the process. It is important to note that it is leadership’s job to identify the variety of roles a board member can play, but the board member must be given the opportunity to choose the role and not be forced into it—here success in a role is critical to ensuring they will continue to be a part of the process.

III. Build a Fundraising System that Helps Them Improve
Finally, it takes a systematic approach to fundraising to help Board members improve. When given opportunities to repeat the same fundraising activity in a consistent way as well as debrief openly with other board members, they are able to go deeper into their role and recognize how what they do contributes to the whole effort. Scatter-shot approaches to fundraising lead to disengaged board members because these kinds of efforts only promote a succeed or fail mentality. Systems help leadership and board members evaluate progress and make adjustments as they come to understand what works well and what needs improvement.

—-

All board members need help understanding how they connect to the organization’s cause. By showing them how their personal strengths can match up with different roles in the fundraising process, they can improve their efforts by playing their role in a larger donor cultivation system. Now, when a board member says “We’re not a fundraising board,” you know it is time to bust the myth.

Article by: Carlo Cuesta, Creation In Common Managing Partner. www.creationincommon.com

Bookmark Advisor to Superheroes

Commit 72 Minutes for the Future of the Nonprofit Sector

Innovaton by Vermin Inc

Innovaton by Vermin Inc


Call to Action

Commit 72 minutes per day to innovate and create a new future for your nonprofit organization. 72 minutes away from putting out fires and reacting to the economy; 72 minutes from the daily grind; 72 minutes focused on challenging assumptions and generating new ideas; 72 minutes building on what your organization is best at; 72 minutes that in a year from now will create deep and meaningful opportunities and 5 years from now will be known as that game-changing moment in your organization’s history.

Background

Ben Cameron, the Arts Program Director for Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, recently captured the real task ahead for the nonprofit sector during these difficult times. In a speech to a group of Minnesota arts leaders he said: “the single biggest challenge lies in how to balance an increasingly perilous equation: managing short-term survival, while pursuing long-term transformation.

He went on to say:

“The groups most likely to survive will innovate—not chasing the flashy or new but truly innovate—a process that Richard Evans describes as “new pathways to mission fulfillment, discontinuous from previous practice, resulting from shifts in underlying organizational assumptions”—a precise and useful delineation of what innovation should really mean—and that is achieved most often, according to futurist Andrew Zolli, by organizations who assemble teams comprised of very different perspectives and histories focused on a common problem, teams focused on base hits rather than home runs, and who rarely simply adopt best practice, recognizing best practice as outputs, not inputs. The groups most likely to survive will embrace a higher risk tolerance —-risk, not irresponsibility but pushing past our comfort zones, armed with our best instincts, our best data, the counsel of others more expert than we–knowing as we do that a business that does not risk does not grow, a relationship with husband wife or partner that does not risk does not grow, the artist who does not risk–however capable– is doomed merely to technical excellence but never achieved the true artistic moment for which we all live and work.”

Off script, he encouraged us to devote 15% [72 minutes per day] of our time to this effort so that “we will remember these times, not as an ordeal for survival, but as a renaissance.”

Commit Now

I am committing 72 minutes per day to create new models, methods, and tools that will build nonprofit organizations’ capacity to engage the public.

What are you committing to? Tell me.

Send me an email (carlo@creationincommon.com) or tweet me on Twitter @cmcuesta (use hashtag #72mins) or leave a comment on this blog.

Tell me that you are willing to commit and what you are committing to. Also, if you feel you are unable to commit, tell me what you think the major barriers are.

Go here to read the full transcript of Ben’s speech. The event he spoke at was through the arts learning xchange series presented by Minnesota Community Foundation and Arts Midwest with support from the Wallace Foundation.

Bookmark Advisor to Superheroes