Rewrite Your Next Board Meeting

At the first board meeting I ever attended, the only person who spoke was my boss, the executive director. Driving back to the office, she asked me what I thought of the meeting. I told her the board was not very engaged. She agreed and said, “I just don’t know how to change that.” I held my tongue thinking to myself, “You can start by shutting up and letting them talk to each other.”

When it was my turn to be an executive director, I humbly admit that I suffered from the same problem—sitting in board meetings, yammering on, and trying to ignite a new level of board engagement through the brilliance I was spewing forth. Now as a board member, I am sympathetic to the executive directors, who cannot stand the excruciating silence and feel the need to share everything in their brain, and my fellow board members who wish the meeting were a million times more engaging.

According BoardSource’s Nonprofit Governance Index 2010, “Boards that are more engaged spend more time on strategic thinking and discussion.” Or, (this is me talking): “Boards that suck, don’t talk to one another and let the executive director run off at the mouth.”

Neither strong (and talented) executive directors, nor quiet (and thoughtful) board members are the problem. The issue is the 60 to 120-minute monthly, bi-monthly, or quarterly experience they have together. Board meetings run on these deep ingrained scripts that are overwritten and uninspired. Agendas, minutes, and reporting lull us into complacency rather than provoking strategic thinking and creativity that drives us toward improvement and innovation. We need to rewrite the script of our next board meeting with fewer monologues for the executive director and more dialogues involving everyone in the room.

Here are a few ways to rip up the current agenda and rewrite the meeting:

1. Imagine a Future – Discussions of vision and goals are typically relegated to the once-a-year retreat when it should be happening at every board meeting. Set aside 30 to 45 minute in the meeting to raise and discuss major strategic questions, examine the organization’s business model, and identify how environmental changes are affecting the organization’s impact. Don’t just talk, synthesize—define a board point of view on the matter and, when appropriate, mobilize members to tackle the issue.

2. Align Resources – Present a financial report that challenges board and staff to imagine how resources can be used more effectively. Instead of reviewing the balance sheet, discuss how eliminating long-term debt can increase dollars for programs or how restricted assets can be better positioned to forward the organization’s strategy. Discover what is driving organizational income and how the expense budget can be better positioned to grow vital revenue sources. Most importantly, ensure that the budget aligns to the strategies developed by the board and staff.

3. Improve Performance – Throw out the typical program report and let board members dive deep into the cause. Have discussions about how impact is created. Focus in on one aspect of the organization’s work, discuss how it works, and explore how it can work better. Overcome the fear that volunteer board members will never understand what professional staff does. Challenge everyone to move beyond off-the-cuff ideas to thinking that is relevant and meaningful to the work.

4. Frame the Message – If board members are going to be on message, they need to help create the message. Let’s get past spoon-feeding what we want board members to say. As strategies, resources, and impact are discussed, let’s encourage members to frame the message. They need to hear the stories that best illustrate the value of the organization’s work, but they also need to create their own stories, using their own words, and in their own voice.

Board Members Are Not Our Development Directors


In the May 1st online edition of the Chronicle of Philanthropy a headline stated: “Charities Give Boards Little Training in Fund Raising, Study Finds.” I would argue that most board members do not want training in fund raising. They didn’t join our organizations because they wanted to learn how to prospect, cultivate, and make “asks.”

When we try to engage our boards in fund raising, we make a glaring mistake—we talk about it from the organization’s perspective rather than the board member’s perspective. We seek to engage them in organizational fund raising mechanisms and activities that make many members feel downright uncomfortable, reinforcing their aversion. The 2010 BoardSource Governance Index survey shows that the situation (board members and their desire to fund raise) is getting worse.

Board members who succeed in the fund raising effort, inherently see it as a means and not an end. The “end” they are seeking, building a strong relationship between those in their network and the cause they care deeply about, is a place where everybody wins—the donor, the board member, and the organization.

To achieve this win-win, we need to help our boards cultivate three capabilities:

I. Learning their own story about the organization — finely worded messages are great, but board members need to find the organizational stories that are most meaningful to them. This helps them in their own self discovery of why they care about the cause as well as builds their ability to share stories that are personally compelling.

II. Finding their role in building organizational influence — each board member brings their own unique talents to helping the organization build relationships. Instead of forcing members to conform to a fundraising approach, first discover what these talents are and create social situations where they can practice using them.

III. Playing an active role in building their strategy — key to engaging board members in the fundraising effort is creating opportunities for them to shape the case for support as well as the greater strategy they will use in helping the organization build influence.

Has Your Nonprofit Board Been Neutered?

Here’s a simple way to find out. In a middle of a board meeting, look at the people around the table and ask yourself: Does the quality of this discussion match the quality of people?

Granted, “quality” is fairly subjective. Yet, it is pretty easy to tell if you have a group of individuals who have a history of success in life and are deeply engaged in family, work, and community service, but for some reason cannot elevate the conversation in the board room beyond trivial issues that are not core to the strengthening the performance of the organization. If this is the situation, your board members have been neutered. They are unclear about why they are getting together with people they hardly know, unclear about what their role and purpose is, and unclear, ultimately, about why they should be engaged.

Worse yet, the nonprofit field has tacitly accepted this “neutered” role for boards. Oh yes, we want effective boards, but we have lowered the bar. We have accepted that the right place for boards is to make decisions over budgets they don’t truly understand, to hire professionals to lead organizations they truly don’t understand, and to approve strategy and actions to create results that they truly don’t understand.

Do we really believe that the next generation of board leaders will accept this? All signs point to Millennials’ commitment to causes is not just hands on, it is hands deep. What this generation teaches us is that for boards to avoid being neutered and to become relevant and meaningful we need to allow them to focus on and shape what truly matters — creating value for the communities they serve.

Here are a few questions for boards to consider:

1. What would happen if we changed the focus of board leadership away from governance and oversight to efficiently and effectively creating value?

2. How can we build an environment within the board meeting where each member is able to listen for the purpose of the organization and share their creativity, skills, and expertise to address the most important issues?

3. How can we grow the board’s sense of accountability to all stakeholders through our focus on developing innovative ideas to improve performance?

Boards that have answered these questions, have avoided being neutered. They see their purpose as central to the cause, they have moved beyond passive oversight and have embraced an active role of seeking out opportunities and innovations to improve the creation of value.

Client Spotlight: Scholarship America

The following video features Scholarship America’s A Dollar A Day Campaign. I had the good fortune to work with this team on their strategic plan. They are doing amazing work in helping the nation understand the issues students face in accessing, completing and reducing debt associated with education beyond high school.

Defining Your Organization’s Value

This installment of the Sixty-Second Strategy covers a quick exercise to help organizations define the value they create and deliver to the communities they serve.

For more information, go to the related post entitled Owning Your Place in the Community.

Also, visit the previous Sixty-Second Strategy installment– Kick Start Your Story.

Owning Your Place in the Community

[The following is an excerpt from a keynote I gave to the Southern Minnesota Nonprofit Summit.]

Fifteen years ago this week was when I arrived in Minnesota to become the Executive Director of The Playwrights’ Center. My wife and I were newly married. We drove 900 miles from Dallas to Minnesota with most our belongings in tow. I was very excited about taking this position. At 27, I would have a staff of 12, a budget of just under a million dollars, financial reserves in the bank, and a strong national reputation to build on. What I didn’t know, it was all a house of cards.

I remember feeling something was up during the interview process and after I took the job it became quickly apparent that the organization was not great shape. The first sign was how out of step the staff and board were with one another, and the second sign, was how disconnected the board was with the organization as a whole. Most troubling, was how the organization’s main participants, playwrights, universally felt the organization was past its prime.

After a week on the job, I was on an airplane going to a national conference and I had brought my calculator along. I was working through next year’s budget on some scratch paper. It might of have been some turbulence or a change in altitude, but I remember my eyes rolling up inside my head and falling against the window, thinking to myself: “What the hell have I done? Why did I take this job?” I was staring out the window at the clouds, but what I was really staring at was an organization that only had half the income needed to balance next years budget with all of its reserves spent on paying off the current year’s expenses.

Cutting half of your expenses is not trimming the fat, it’s not even just cutting into the bone, it’s all out amputation. Not to sound too graphic, but what followed was a blood bath. We cut programs, staff, anything and everything. After we were done (besides the fact that no one on staff would talk to me) we bought ourselves a little time, but we did not solve the intrinsic issue—we had become irrelevant.

Soon after I was having lunch with a board member, who had been on the board for about four years, and she asked me: “What is that we do?” After staring blankly at her, I launched into my spiel and quickly realized she wasn’t listening. She stopped me and said: “Why should I care?”

As you can imagine, this was a very dark moment for me, but also a very illuminating one.

A client of mine, whose organization was in a similar situation, once said to me: “We are not who we are.” This struck me because if you do not know who you are, then no one else knows who you are. Your organization lives on the edge of relevancy. It does not own a place in the community. It’s peripheral.

Overtime, I have come to learn that answering the question “who are we?” is not solved by just developing a well-worded mission statement. Knowing your purpose is important, but it is only an inward view. Leading healthy and impactful organizations requires both an inward and outward view of your work. Knowing “who are we?” is also about the value you choose to create, and more importantly, who you create this value for. The value you choose to create is ultimately what determines who you are in relationship with and allows you to shine a light on your place in the community.

Please take out a sheet of paper.

1. In the middle of the sheet of paper create a box large enough to write inside of it. Like this.

2. Now, in the middle of the box, write down the specific meaningful value your organization creates and delivers to the communities you serve. This is different than your mission. This is actually what gets delivered—as tangible as food for the hungry or intangible as food for the soul. Be specific as possible.

3. Now, at the top of the box describe the people who directly receive the value you have created and delivered. These are your participants or clients or audiences.

4. Identify the people who are investing in the value you create, again be as specific as possible. These could be foundations, individual donors, and government agencies.

5. The next step is a little more difficult. Identify the people who benefit from the value you create but not directly. This could be a neighbor living on a street where gang violence has declined due to your youth program.

6. Now, identify the people who create this value. This is you, your board and staff, and volunteers as well as partners you work with.

7. Finally, look at your work and answer the following questions:

    How relevant is the value you create to the people around the box?

    If you change the value you create, how would the people around this box change? Who would join and who would go away?

    Is there audience or constituency you always wanted a relationship with, what kind of change in value would you need to make in order to be relevant enough to attract them?

    How can we accelerate pursuit of our mission by creating value that brings the people we need to succeed together?

Keeping an eye on the value you create, needs to be a strategic governance and operational priority. Not only to sustain your organizations, but to also take your work to new heights. This is not something you check in on every three years, it’s something you do in real time. You also must do it in ways that reaches out beyond your own notions and embraces multiple points of view.

Turkish author, Elif Shafak summed this up nicely in a TED Talk that she did a few years ago, she said: “We all live in a social and cultural circle… If we have no connection what so ever with the world’s beyond the ones we take for granted then we run the risk of drying up inside. Our imagination might shrink, our hearts may dwindle, and our humanness might wither if we stay for too long in our cultural cocoons.”

Inherent to the value we create for the communities we serve is keeping the impulse and inspiration to create alive. We do this by reaching both into and beyond the world “we take for granted” and engaging communities in a creative process.

This is how we saved the Playwrights’ Center from extinction. It didn’t happen overnight, it actually became an ongoing process, one that started with lots of listening that led to many ideas, that led to defining a strategy, that led to taking action, that led to a change in the value we created. In fact, over a six year period, we moved from being a “club house for playwrights” that was no longer relevant into a conduit for playwrights and other artists, playwrights and audiences, playwrights and theatres, playwrights and businesses, etc. to forge deep connections.

Through this rich collaboration with artists, funders, businesses, educators, neighborhood residents, etc.—we came alive. They helped us rediscover the meaning in our work and find our place in the community. And as soon as we did, we started again.

Here are a few principles I would like you to take a way from this talk:

1. Know the value you create. Work with board and staff members to define it.

2. Create an open invitation to explore. Reach beyond your inner circles and welcome others into the process.

3. Instigate and lead the inquiry. We are experts and we should take on the responsibility to ignite these conversations out in the communities we serve.

4. Be passionate not opinionated. Do not create a competition among ideas, welcome differing point of views as well as not lose sight in what you believe.

5. Own the Direction. Once you choose a course of action, take ownership of it and nurture it.

That board member who I had lunch with, got caught up in this rich creative collaboration we forged. She ended up leading our capital campaign to build a place where we could deliver all this value. She raised a lot of money for a cause that she truly believe in.

Simplicity in Your Message: From MINNESOTA ORGANIZATION ON ADOLESCENT PARENTING, PREVENTION & PARENTING… to Teen Wise Minnesota

MOAPPP (Minnesota Organizational on Adolescent Parenting, Preventing, and Parenting) engaged Creation In Common to help them develop a new name. Though the acronym became known among close stakeholders, few were able to identify the value the organization created (and fewer were able to get the three “P”s in the right order).

Graphic Design By Jennifer Brower Montgomery

As MOAPPP completed a comprehensive strategic planning process, the organization recognized that its role in the state had broaden from working primarily on teen pregnancy prevention to focusing on adolescent sexual health and parenting. Creation In Common facilitated a naming ideation process that included in-depth interviews with key stakeholders and focus groups to test naming alternatives. Teen Wise Minnesota consistently received high marks from MOAPPP’s primary audience — educators and professionals working with youth as well as being well-received by a new audience the organization wishes to target— parents of adolescents.

The name was unveiled today at Teen Wise’s annual conference.