Here are three key ingredients to create an effective mission statement.
View these previous Sixty-Second Strategy segments…
Here are three key ingredients to create an effective mission statement.
View these previous Sixty-Second Strategy segments…
Several year’s ago I was facilitating a meeting when the president of the organization said… “We are not who we are.” That odd statement codified what everyone was feeling in the room—lost. Somewhere along the organization’s journey it got detoured and ended up in a place it never intended to go, serving the community not as effectively as it could, and focused on daily issues that seemed deeply disconnected from its mission.
This is not an uncommon story. Nonprofit organizations face many twists and turns in pursuit of mission. Sometimes a much sought after grant goes from becoming a necessary resource to the organization’s central focus, or a succession of bad hires leads the organization away from the cause. Choices were made where the mission was never really adhered to or considered. Worse yet, the mission was never really relevant or meaningful to those leading the organization and led to arbitrary and unfocused decision making.
Organizations are at risk when mission is only a statement; a device used as a reference point, or a special decoder that offers a hidden answer. Above all, mission is a feeling. An organization’s leadership may capture it in a carefully worded statement, but before that happens a sense of being emerges from a milieu of diverse passions. Mission is about a group of people imagining the change they can create and exploring these possibilities together. Through their collective action, they discover something in common within one another, a shared sense of purpose. This feeling is so great that it deserves to be written down.
Beyond an organization’s capacity to manage day-to-day challenges or align action to mission, is the greater capability to keep a feeling or sense of mission alive. To do so, leadership must regularly reconnect to four domains:
People – Knowing and understanding whom we wish to actively affect and why; this needs to be viewed through an inclusive lens, considering all potential stakeholders.
Passion – Getting to the heart of what collectively moves board, staff, and volunteers to action; answering why we as a group are motivated to act together.
Promise – Defining the specific meaningful value we promise to create and deliver; articulating the impact we will strive to bring into the world.
Principles – Deciding on the best way to act that upholds what we believe in; allowing the organization to live in a principled way.
Together, these four domains form a prism that helps leadership reflect on how the mission is advancing and maturing. If there is one capability board and staff should share is the ability to look at each domain on a daily basis through every interaction and, on special occasions, bring these domains together and discuss what is learned.
Before writing or re-writing a mission statement, leadership must feel the mission, intuitively understanding why it has emerged, why it is meaningful, and why they wish to be a part of it.
Posted in collaboration
Tagged board development, Board Members, causes, collaboration, nonprofit, Nonprofit Boards
At the first board meeting I ever attended, the only person who spoke was my boss, the executive director. Driving back to the office, she asked me what I thought of the meeting. I told her the board was not very engaged. She agreed and said, “I just don’t know how to change that.” I held my tongue thinking to myself, “You can start by shutting up and letting them talk to each other.”
When it was my turn to be an executive director, I humbly admit that I suffered from the same problem—sitting in board meetings, yammering on, and trying to ignite a new level of board engagement through the brilliance I was spewing forth. Now as a board member, I am sympathetic to the executive directors, who cannot stand the excruciating silence and feel the need to share everything in their brain, and my fellow board members who wish the meeting were a million times more engaging.
According BoardSource’s Nonprofit Governance Index 2010, “Boards that are more engaged spend more time on strategic thinking and discussion.” Or, (this is me talking): “Boards that suck, don’t talk to one another and let the executive director run off at the mouth.”
Neither strong (and talented) executive directors, nor quiet (and thoughtful) board members are the problem. The issue is the 60 to 120-minute monthly, bi-monthly, or quarterly experience they have together. Board meetings run on these deep ingrained scripts that are overwritten and uninspired. Agendas, minutes, and reporting lull us into complacency rather than provoking strategic thinking and creativity that drives us toward improvement and innovation. We need to rewrite the script of our next board meeting with fewer monologues for the executive director and more dialogues involving everyone in the room.
Here are a few ways to rip up the current agenda and rewrite the meeting:
1. Imagine a Future – Discussions of vision and goals are typically relegated to the once-a-year retreat when it should be happening at every board meeting. Set aside 30 to 45 minute in the meeting to raise and discuss major strategic questions, examine the organization’s business model, and identify how environmental changes are affecting the organization’s impact. Don’t just talk, synthesize—define a board point of view on the matter and, when appropriate, mobilize members to tackle the issue.
2. Align Resources – Present a financial report that challenges board and staff to imagine how resources can be used more effectively. Instead of reviewing the balance sheet, discuss how eliminating long-term debt can increase dollars for programs or how restricted assets can be better positioned to forward the organization’s strategy. Discover what is driving organizational income and how the expense budget can be better positioned to grow vital revenue sources. Most importantly, ensure that the budget aligns to the strategies developed by the board and staff.
3. Improve Performance – Throw out the typical program report and let board members dive deep into the cause. Have discussions about how impact is created. Focus in on one aspect of the organization’s work, discuss how it works, and explore how it can work better. Overcome the fear that volunteer board members will never understand what professional staff does. Challenge everyone to move beyond off-the-cuff ideas to thinking that is relevant and meaningful to the work.
4. Frame the Message – If board members are going to be on message, they need to help create the message. Let’s get past spoon-feeding what we want board members to say. As strategies, resources, and impact are discussed, let’s encourage members to frame the message. They need to hear the stories that best illustrate the value of the organization’s work, but they also need to create their own stories, using their own words, and in their own voice.
Here’s a simple way to find out. In a middle of a board meeting, look at the people around the table and ask yourself: Does the quality of this discussion match the quality of people?
Granted, “quality” is fairly subjective. Yet, it is pretty easy to tell if you have a group of individuals who have a history of success in life and are deeply engaged in family, work, and community service, but for some reason cannot elevate the conversation in the board room beyond trivial issues that are not core to the strengthening the performance of the organization. If this is the situation, your board members have been neutered. They are unclear about why they are getting together with people they hardly know, unclear about what their role and purpose is, and unclear, ultimately, about why they should be engaged.
Worse yet, the nonprofit field has tacitly accepted this “neutered” role for boards. Oh yes, we want effective boards, but we have lowered the bar. We have accepted that the right place for boards is to make decisions over budgets they don’t truly understand, to hire professionals to lead organizations they truly don’t understand, and to approve strategy and actions to create results that they truly don’t understand.
Do we really believe that the next generation of board leaders will accept this? All signs point to Millennials’ commitment to causes is not just hands on, it is hands deep. What this generation teaches us is that for boards to avoid being neutered and to become relevant and meaningful we need to allow them to focus on and shape what truly matters — creating value for the communities they serve.
Here are a few questions for boards to consider:
1. What would happen if we changed the focus of board leadership away from governance and oversight to efficiently and effectively creating value?
2. How can we build an environment within the board meeting where each member is able to listen for the purpose of the organization and share their creativity, skills, and expertise to address the most important issues?
3. How can we grow the board’s sense of accountability to all stakeholders through our focus on developing innovative ideas to improve performance?
Boards that have answered these questions, have avoided being neutered. They see their purpose as central to the cause, they have moved beyond passive oversight and have embraced an active role of seeking out opportunities and innovations to improve the creation of value.
This installment of the Sixty-Second Strategy covers a quick exercise to help organizations define the value they create and deliver to the communities they serve.
For more information, go to the related post entitled Owning Your Place in the Community.
Also, visit the previous Sixty-Second Strategy installment– Kick Start Your Story.
[The following is an excerpt from a keynote I gave to the Southern Minnesota Nonprofit Summit.]
Fifteen years ago this week was when I arrived in Minnesota to become the Executive Director of The Playwrights’ Center. My wife and I were newly married. We drove 900 miles from Dallas to Minnesota with most our belongings in tow. I was very excited about taking this position. At 27, I would have a staff of 12, a budget of just under a million dollars, financial reserves in the bank, and a strong national reputation to build on. What I didn’t know, it was all a house of cards.
I remember feeling something was up during the interview process and after I took the job it became quickly apparent that the organization was not great shape. The first sign was how out of step the staff and board were with one another, and the second sign, was how disconnected the board was with the organization as a whole. Most troubling, was how the organization’s main participants, playwrights, universally felt the organization was past its prime.
After a week on the job, I was on an airplane going to a national conference and I had brought my calculator along. I was working through next year’s budget on some scratch paper. It might of have been some turbulence or a change in altitude, but I remember my eyes rolling up inside my head and falling against the window, thinking to myself: “What the hell have I done? Why did I take this job?” I was staring out the window at the clouds, but what I was really staring at was an organization that only had half the income needed to balance next years budget with all of its reserves spent on paying off the current year’s expenses.
Cutting half of your expenses is not trimming the fat, it’s not even just cutting into the bone, it’s all out amputation. Not to sound too graphic, but what followed was a blood bath. We cut programs, staff, anything and everything. After we were done (besides the fact that no one on staff would talk to me) we bought ourselves a little time, but we did not solve the intrinsic issue—we had become irrelevant.
Soon after I was having lunch with a board member, who had been on the board for about four years, and she asked me: “What is that we do?” After staring blankly at her, I launched into my spiel and quickly realized she wasn’t listening. She stopped me and said: “Why should I care?”
As you can imagine, this was a very dark moment for me, but also a very illuminating one.
A client of mine, whose organization was in a similar situation, once said to me: “We are not who we are.” This struck me because if you do not know who you are, then no one else knows who you are. Your organization lives on the edge of relevancy. It does not own a place in the community. It’s peripheral.
Overtime, I have come to learn that answering the question “who are we?” is not solved by just developing a well-worded mission statement. Knowing your purpose is important, but it is only an inward view. Leading healthy and impactful organizations requires both an inward and outward view of your work. Knowing “who are we?” is also about the value you choose to create, and more importantly, who you create this value for. The value you choose to create is ultimately what determines who you are in relationship with and allows you to shine a light on your place in the community.
Please take out a sheet of paper.
1. In the middle of the sheet of paper create a box large enough to write inside of it. Like this.

2. Now, in the middle of the box, write down the specific meaningful value your organization creates and delivers to the communities you serve. This is different than your mission. This is actually what gets delivered—as tangible as food for the hungry or intangible as food for the soul. Be specific as possible.

3. Now, at the top of the box describe the people who directly receive the value you have created and delivered. These are your participants or clients or audiences.

4. Identify the people who are investing in the value you create, again be as specific as possible. These could be foundations, individual donors, and government agencies.

5. The next step is a little more difficult. Identify the people who benefit from the value you create but not directly. This could be a neighbor living on a street where gang violence has declined due to your youth program.

6. Now, identify the people who create this value. This is you, your board and staff, and volunteers as well as partners you work with.

7. Finally, look at your work and answer the following questions:
If you change the value you create, how would the people around this box change? Who would join and who would go away?
Is there audience or constituency you always wanted a relationship with, what kind of change in value would you need to make in order to be relevant enough to attract them?
How can we accelerate pursuit of our mission by creating value that brings the people we need to succeed together?
Keeping an eye on the value you create, needs to be a strategic governance and operational priority. Not only to sustain your organizations, but to also take your work to new heights. This is not something you check in on every three years, it’s something you do in real time. You also must do it in ways that reaches out beyond your own notions and embraces multiple points of view.
Turkish author, Elif Shafak summed this up nicely in a TED Talk that she did a few years ago, she said: “We all live in a social and cultural circle… If we have no connection what so ever with the world’s beyond the ones we take for granted then we run the risk of drying up inside. Our imagination might shrink, our hearts may dwindle, and our humanness might wither if we stay for too long in our cultural cocoons.”
Inherent to the value we create for the communities we serve is keeping the impulse and inspiration to create alive. We do this by reaching both into and beyond the world “we take for granted” and engaging communities in a creative process.
This is how we saved the Playwrights’ Center from extinction. It didn’t happen overnight, it actually became an ongoing process, one that started with lots of listening that led to many ideas, that led to defining a strategy, that led to taking action, that led to a change in the value we created. In fact, over a six year period, we moved from being a “club house for playwrights” that was no longer relevant into a conduit for playwrights and other artists, playwrights and audiences, playwrights and theatres, playwrights and businesses, etc. to forge deep connections.
Through this rich collaboration with artists, funders, businesses, educators, neighborhood residents, etc.—we came alive. They helped us rediscover the meaning in our work and find our place in the community. And as soon as we did, we started again.
Here are a few principles I would like you to take a way from this talk:
1. Know the value you create. Work with board and staff members to define it.
2. Create an open invitation to explore. Reach beyond your inner circles and welcome others into the process.
3. Instigate and lead the inquiry. We are experts and we should take on the responsibility to ignite these conversations out in the communities we serve.
4. Be passionate not opinionated. Do not create a competition among ideas, welcome differing point of views as well as not lose sight in what you believe.
5. Own the Direction. Once you choose a course of action, take ownership of it and nurture it.
That board member who I had lunch with, got caught up in this rich creative collaboration we forged. She ended up leading our capital campaign to build a place where we could deliver all this value. She raised a lot of money for a cause that she truly believe in.
Six years ago, I wrote Building the Nonprofit Brand from the Inside Out and its time to revise it. Much has changed in the area of nonprofit marketing, communications, and branding.
Before I start my revision, I welcome any thoughts on the topic. Please read the article and send your comments. I will attribute any insights on this blog before relaunching the article.
Thanks,
Commit 72 minutes per day to innovate and create a new future for your nonprofit organization. 72 minutes away from putting out fires and reacting to the economy; 72 minutes from the daily grind; 72 minutes focused on challenging assumptions and generating new ideas; 72 minutes building on what your organization is best at; 72 minutes that in a year from now will create deep and meaningful opportunities and 5 years from now will be known as that game-changing moment in your organization’s history.
Background
Ben Cameron, the Arts Program Director for Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, recently captured the real task ahead for the nonprofit sector during these difficult times. In a speech to a group of Minnesota arts leaders he said: “the single biggest challenge lies in how to balance an increasingly perilous equation: managing short-term survival, while pursuing long-term transformation.
He went on to say:
“The groups most likely to survive will innovate—not chasing the flashy or new but truly innovate—a process that Richard Evans describes as “new pathways to mission fulfillment, discontinuous from previous practice, resulting from shifts in underlying organizational assumptions”—a precise and useful delineation of what innovation should really mean—and that is achieved most often, according to futurist Andrew Zolli, by organizations who assemble teams comprised of very different perspectives and histories focused on a common problem, teams focused on base hits rather than home runs, and who rarely simply adopt best practice, recognizing best practice as outputs, not inputs. The groups most likely to survive will embrace a higher risk tolerance —-risk, not irresponsibility but pushing past our comfort zones, armed with our best instincts, our best data, the counsel of others more expert than we–knowing as we do that a business that does not risk does not grow, a relationship with husband wife or partner that does not risk does not grow, the artist who does not risk–however capable– is doomed merely to technical excellence but never achieved the true artistic moment for which we all live and work.”
Off script, he encouraged us to devote 15% [72 minutes per day] of our time to this effort so that “we will remember these times, not as an ordeal for survival, but as a renaissance.”
Commit Now
I am committing 72 minutes per day to create new models, methods, and tools that will build nonprofit organizations’ capacity to engage the public.
What are you committing to? Tell me.
Send me an email (carlo@creationincommon.com) or tweet me on Twitter @cmcuesta (use hashtag #72mins) or leave a comment on this blog.
Tell me that you are willing to commit and what you are committing to. Also, if you feel you are unable to commit, tell me what you think the major barriers are.
Go here to read the full transcript of Ben’s speech. The event he spoke at was through the arts learning xchange series presented by Minnesota Community Foundation and Arts Midwest with support from the Wallace Foundation.
Posted in collaboration, Creativity and Innovation
Tagged arts learning xchange, Ben Cameron, board development, Board Members, brand identity, causes, collaboration, creation in common, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, innovation, NGO, nonprofit, Nonprofit Branding, Nonprofits, resource development
This post is part three of a three-part series on board/staff collaboration. Go here to read part one and here to read part two.
“What we got here is a failure to communicate” said the Board President slightly chuckling at his own joke.
“Actually, what we have is a failure to listen” the Executive Director answered back.
Time for polite conversation was over. The Executive Director believed that the window for proactive solutions was beginning to close and the door to crisis management was about to open. This organization was heading for trouble. For the past half hour their conversation had gone round and round about how best to engage the Board in fundraising, and more specifically helping to cultivate new donors.
The Board President took a deep breath and began again: “We’re not a fundraising board. That’s the reality…”
“Nor is this Board engaged around our cause.”
“Yes,” only slightly agreeing “but most care deeply about the people we serve.”
“Deeply enough to help us avert a crisis?”
“I don’t know. What do you think we should do?”
“I don’t know.”
The conversation came to a halt. They each looked away from one another. Then the Executive Director decide to try a different approach:
“When you look at our organization, what engages you the most?” he asked.
The Board President was not sure. “There are so many different programs and services we offer. They all do good work…”
“But is there an experience that you had over the course of your tenure on the Board, that makes you think ‘ah, yes that’s why I’m doing this!’”
“That happened early on before I was even on the Board” he began. “I was on a tour of one of the centers and I met a young man who told me a little about his life before he came here. He was doing drugs, dropped out of high school, and started hanging out with a gang. It seemed that the whole world gave up on him and he gave up on himself. He somehow found his way to one of our centers, got a job, was encouraged to stay away from the gang, finished high school and went onto college. What struck me the most is that he could of very easily had been a headline in the newspaper, something I would have overlooked. But there he was standing before me—proof that no life should ever be thrown away.”
“‘No life should ever be thrown away’” repeated the executive director. “That’s a great story. That’s why I’m here too.”
Being completely upfront and honest, the Board President said: “My time on the Board hasn’t lived up to that moment; not that I need to have those kinds of experiences everyday but I really hadn’t thought about that encounter in a long time.”
“We need to change that” replied the Executive Director.
And the conversation begins.
“We’ve already tried that, it didn’t work.”
The board member smiled back at the organization’s marketing director and thought: “you may have tried it, but did you do it right?”
The marketing committee meeting was approaching its conclusion and nothing had been accomplished. The first 10 minutes were spent on waiting for people to arrive and picking through a box lunch, 15 minutes on the marketing director bringing everyone up to speed, and the last 30 minutes spent on people offering up ideas on how to help the organization “build awareness”—none of which was focused and all of which put the marketing director and her half-time assistant on edge, fearful that they were about to have a lot of tasks dumped on them.
The board member glanced at the clock on the wall and thought about the important presentation she needed to prepare back at the office. She was not sure why she agreed to sit on this committee, other than the fact that she has 25-years in brand management and product marketing and thought she could help the organization out. She tried to push the meeting forward: “What are our next steps?”
Recognizing they were out of time the marketing director replied: “We should schedule our next meeting?”
As she was leaving the building, the board member ran into the organization’s new executive director. “How was the marketing committee meeting?” he asked.
“I’m not sure I’m the right person for this job” she replied candidly.
“Did something happen?”
“No, nothing happened.” She paused. “I have so much on my plate right now at work; I am going to be out of the country quite a bit over the next twelve months so it going to be hard for me to be active.”
“We can really use your expertise. You have so much to offer.”
“Really? It didn’t seem that way to me” she thought to herself “and by the way, I want the last hour of my life back.”
She could see the concern and disappointment on his face. She smiled at him and said: “I will help you find a replacement.”